Friday, October 1, 2010

Back after a year

A lot of things can change over the course of a year and a lot of things have. Rather than ramble on about those though, I figured I'd comment on another blog post I recently read. It was about ING Streetwise funds. http://www.steadyhand.com/industry/2010/09/23/ing_streetwise_crossing_the_line/
She also talks about fees,

“Say you invest $10,000. You can save $170 per year.”

Her math here would imply that investors are paying 2.7% elsewhere for balanced fund management. While I have sympathy with this theme (balanced funds are the most overpriced fund category), the numbers don’t add up. There are few balanced funds that charge that much.


I for some reason am reminded of car insurance advertisements. All the major companies out there advertise how much the average person who switched saved. They can all do that because there is no insurance company out there able to draw in an abundance of new customers who want to pay more for the same coverage. In fact, most people aren't going to switch for a small amount, they'll only switch for a relatively large amount. Since all the ads discuss the average savings of the people who do switch, this is a relatively high figure. They don't actually assert that they have the potential to save everyone hundreds of dollars, they merely want to make it sound like that.

Not everyone can save $170 per year, and ING doesn't assert that everyone will, they merely want to make it sound like that.

Hmm, what sort of stuff do I usually talk about on this blog? A mix of money and philosophy of life? I need a bit of a refresher.

No comments: